By: Senate
Information Office
Follow-up legislation to House Bill 221 was heard on January 11 on the Senate
floor, as Sen. Seth Harp of the 29th introduced
Senate Bill 383, which makes changes
to the current law governing the determination
and payment of child support.
The bill spells out the means for calculating
child support-instructing the
court to determine the amount based on
the gross income and adjusted gross
income of both parents. The table determines
the pro-rata share of the Basic
Child Support Obligation for each parent,
making adjustments for parenting time,
factors regarding health insurance, workrelated
child care costs and other factors
prior to determining the final child support
order.
Sen. Harp said that the primary goal
of the Commission that was responsible
for writing the proposed legislation is to
take care of children.
"This bill brings Georgia's child support
law into the 21st Century, " he said.
The legislation was amended by
Sens. Renee Unterman of the 45th and
Valencia Seay of the 34th. Sen. Unterman's
amendment mandates that if the
non-custodial parent spends more than
120 days with their child, then the percentage
of their child support would be
adjusted according to the following
schedule:
| 121-136 days |
10 percent |
| 137-151 days |
20 percent |
| 152-166 days |
30 percent |
| 167-181 days |
40 percent |
| 182 + days |
50 percent |
Sen. Seay's amendment orders judges
to find non-custodial parents in contempt
of court if they fail to aide by the visitation/
payment schedule.
"There are good dads out there and
it is hard to find ways to help them,
because they are being bused," Sen. Steve
Thompson of the 33rd said. "A great percentage
of the problem is that there are
dads out there who are not great dads."
It’s Round Two
For Voter ID
Legislation
By: Senate Information Office
In what seemed to be déjà vu all over
again, the senate debated the Voter ID
legislation for the third time in less than a
year on January 9-this time to "perfect'
the legislation passed during the 2005
Session. It was round two for the senate
bill 84, authorized by Senator Cecil Staton
of the 18th, which was originally
debated last March, only to be attached to
House Bill 244 and debated for the second
time. SB 84,which languished in the
House for 9 months, was reborn earlier
this year and replaced with language
making it easier for Georgians without
one of the 6 approved identification
cards-including a driver's license, a
passport or a military ID.
"For me, this is about the future, not
the past," Sen. Staton, who agreed there
are problems with absentee voter fraud,
said. "Our civil rights dictate that we have
a right to vote without undue encumbrances.
But our civil rights also dictate
that we have a right to have our vote
count, and not be disqualified by someone
else who votes illegally or who commits
fraud."
After U.S. District court judge Harold
Murphy halted the law that Gov. Perdue
signed last year, saying it was equal to a "poll" tax and was unfair to certain groups
-especially the poor, the elderly and
minorities. The first week of the Session,
the House of Representatives sought to
make the changes so that it would pass
Court and U.S. Department of Justice
muster. The new legislation specifies that
the State will provide free identification
cards to all registered voters upon
request, and that all county board of elections
and all local offices of the Department
of Driver's Services-more than
120 locations across the state will provide
the state-issued ID card. The legislation
also specifies that the State must
educate voters about he new law.
"This bill is not about depriving people
from voting," Sen. Preston Smith of the
52nd said. "This is about that sacred
right which so many have fought and died
for. It is about ensuring that we can vote
and that our vote will have some meaning
and not be cancelled out by the perpetuation
of fraud."
Despite efforts to repair the legislation,
the bill was not without its detractors.
"The 26th Amendment gave the right
to vote to all us citizens 18 years of age or
older," said Sen. Kasim Reed of the 35th,
who has fought vehemently against the
legislation told the members of the Senate,
"Failure to present a photo ID is not
grounds for denying the right to vote."
|