By Gail Barney,
Associate Editor
Washington, D.C. - As states grapple
with their third straight year of fiscal
misery and struggle with a cumulative
$200 billion in revenue shortfalls, policymakers
in 25 states have implemented
smarter, less costly sentencing and correctional
reforms, according to a new
report commissioned by Families Against
Mandatory Minimums (FAMM) and
authored by Judith A. Greene.
Ms. Greene identified a fast-growing
national trend of state-level criminal
justice reforms: "From Alabama to
Wisconsin, public officials in 25 states
have made major improvements in
their sentencing and correctional policies.
Four more states have similar
reform proposals under consideration.
Seventeen states, including Michigan,
Louisiana, Washington, Texas, Kansas
and Mississippi have rolled back mandatory
minimum sentences or restructured
other harsh penalties enacted in preceding
years to "get tough" on low-level or
non-violent offenders, especially those
convicted of drug offenses.
Sentencing experts, policy makers,
corrections officials, former prisoners
and advocates from around the country
will discuss the growing sentencing and
corrections reform movement and many
of the reforms detailed in the report at
the opening plenary session of the first
ever State Strategies for Criminal Justice
Reform Conference at the Tremont Plaza
Hotel in Baltimore, Md., on Monday, Nov.
10, 2003, from 8:40a.m.-10a.m.
In 2002, Michigan legislation
repealed almost all of the state's mandatory
minimum drug statutes-long cited
as among the toughest in the nation-
replacing them with drug sentencing
guidelines that give discretion back to
Michigan judges. These sweeping
reforms were crafted by an unusual
alliance of prosecutors, reform advocates,
drug court judges and civil rights
groups, and accomplished with broad
bipartisan support that crossed traditional
political alignments. Michigan will save
an estimated $41 million this year alone
because of the reforms.
The growing movement toward "smart on crime" "sentencing and corrections
policies is not driven solely by
dollars," said Laura Sager, FAMM
Executive Director. "In the last few years,
there has been a major shift in public
opinion and political will away from
criminal justice policies that do not distinguish
between offenders and waste
precious tax resources on incarcerating
too many low-level nonviolent lawbreakers."
Rep. Mike Kowall (R-White Lake,
MI) voted for the reforms. "Make no
mistake about it, I have no problem with
putting people in jail. I consider myself to
the right of Attila the Hun. This just gets
back to common-sense approaches to
crime rather than just locking them up
and throwing away the key. I tell my colleagues
throughout the U.S., "Don't be
afraid of taking on these issues for fear of
being chastised as soft on crime." It never
came up, and I was in a heated primary. We
have to analyze what we're doing and
then proceed from there." said Kowall.
Sixteen states including Texas, Washington,
Colorado and Kentucky have eased prison population pressures by shortening
time served in prison, increasing the
release rate and sanctioning probation
or parole violators without returning them
to prison. Texas policymakers introduced
parole reform in 2000 that resulted in a
dramatic decrease in their state's prison
population-7,698 from September 2000
to December 2001.
Ohio's policymakers used structured
sentencing reforms at both the front-end
and the back-end of the correctional system
to stabilize the prison population and
to reduce the numbers of prisoners by
4,000. In January 2002, corrections director
Reginald Wilkinson shut down the
Orient Correctional Institution, wringing as
much as $40 million out of the annual correction's
budget. This year he has moved to
close a second prison. Since the state
budget crisis, governors in many states-
California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Utah and Virginia-have
closed entire prisons to save correctional
cost.
Director Wilkinson, "At a time states
are cutting essential services to cure the
budgetary epidemic, reexamining sentencing,
parole and other criminal justice policy
is the smart way to save millions of dollars
and enact policies that protect public
safety without bankrupting our state."
The conference is sponsored by ACLU
of Texas, California Prison Moratorium
Project, Citizens Alliance on Prison & Public
Spending (CAPPS), Correctional Associates
of New York, Families Against Mandatory
Minimums (FAMM), Justice Fellowship,
Justice Policy Institute, Volunteers of
America, Western Prison Project and hosted
by the Open Society Institute.
Information provided by FAMM.
|